Sexual Harassment Allegations Against CJI Gogoi : Principles Of Astrology Prove Astrologer Anil Aggarwala

by astrodocanil
379 views

900 Articles and Prediction sin justy 48 months from April 2015

Rahu Forward motion and Venus Fallen Connected to Saturn most Venomous in the chart of CJI and bound to implicate him and bring defamation

Read My Following Articles
1.”Court Case Against CJI Ranjan Gogoi Today What Star’s Foretell ? Astrologer Anil Aggarwala” https://www.astrodocanil.com/2019/04/court-case-again…r-anil-aggarwala/ ‎
2.”Astrology Predicts Natal Rahu Forward Motion and Venus Fallen May Implicate a Person Of Status Astrologer Anil Aggarwala” https://www.astrodocanil.com/2019/04/astrology-predic…r-anil-aggarwala/ ‎
All is Clear from what ever is happening. This is not my opinion but as per Total Astrological Analysis

ASTROLOGY CAN PREDICT ANY THING AND EVERY THING.

It seems that the CJI is has Capricorn Ascendant and Rahu and Venus Both Bent upon creating Issues for him and implicate him . This was all destined for him as per Astrology
Now Read the News from the Media

“Sexual harassment allegations against CJI Gogoi: Don’t probe in woman’s absence, hurts SC name, Justice Chandrachud tells panel ” https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/newsindia/sexual-harassment-allegations-against-cji-gogoi-dont-probe-in-womans-absence-hurts-sc-name-justice-chandrachud-tells-panel/ar-AAAU7h1?ocid=spartanntp
In a move that reflects the sense of disquiet in the higher judiciary and could have far-reaching consequences, a sitting judge of the Supreme Court, Justice D Y Chandrachud, has asked the in-house panel probing allegations of sexual harassment against Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi to not proceed with the inquiry “ex parte”, The Indian Express has learnt.
Justice Chandrachud is tenth in the list of seniority and in line to be the Chief Justice for two years, from 2022 to 2024.
Sources have also confirmed to The Indian Express that Justice Chandrachud, accompanied by Justice Rohintan Nariman, met the inquiry panel comprising Justices S A Bobde, Indu Malhotra and Indira Banerjee on Friday evening. It is believed that the two judges discussed their concerns about the ongoing probe with the panel.
Fifth in seniority among the judges of the Supreme Court, Justice Nariman is currently a member of the Collegium.
On May 2, Justice Chandrachud wrote to the three judges in the probe panel that the credibility of the Supreme Court would be further damaged if they decided to continue with the probe in the absence of the complainant, who has withdrawn from the inquiry.
He also suggested that the committee could either accede to the complainant’s ‘equest to provide her with a lawyer or appoint an amicus curiae for the probe.
The inquiry committee had decided to proceed “ex parte” or carry on in her absence after the complainant declared that she was withdrawing from the probe.
This decision was taken by the three judges on April 30 when the complainant said that she was “compelled to walk out” because the judges who are part of the panel did not seem to appreciate the fact that “this was not an ordinary complaint but was a complaint of sexual harassment against a sitting CJI” and refused to allow a lawyer or support person to accompany her during her deposition.
The in-house committee was formed after a decision of the full court on the administrative side following the affidavit filed by the complainant. It has since been gripped by controversy, with one of the original members, Justice N V Ramana, recusing after the complainant alleged that he was “like family” to CJI Gogoi.
Justice Ramana was then replaced by Justice Malhotra. After the probe was announced, the complainant had also said that the committee, by virtue of not having a woman member as its head or an external member, was not following “the procedure under the Vishaka guidelines and the Prevention of Sexual Harassment Against Women at the Workplace Act 2013”.
The complainant, after two sittings, lasting about three hours each, chose to withdraw during the third sitting and told the committee about her decision to do so. The three judges are said to have told her they were left with no choice but to continue with the proceedings ex parte. On Wednesday, CJI Gogoi appeared before the probe panel.
The complainant, in a letter to the committee, and in a press release on Tuesday, said that she found the committee intimidating. And that there was a need to adopt a “procedure that would ensure fairness and equality in the highly unequal circumstances” she said she was placed in. “I had hoped that the approach of the committee towards me would be sensitive and not one that would cause me further fear, anxiety and trauma,” she added.
In her 28-page original complaint, the woman had alleged that on October 10 and October 11, 2018, the CJI had made sexual advances in his home office, where she was posted, and touched her inappropriately.
She had said that after she resisted his “sexual advances”, she was fired and her husband and brother-in-law, both
posted with the Delhi Police as head constables, were subsequently suspended. CJI Gogoi had called the allegations “unbelievable” and said he wouldn’t’even dignify them with a denial.
Soon after the report on the allegations was first published, a bench led by CJI Gogoi had put out an order signed by two other judges saying this was part of a “conspiracy”.
Subsequently, on an affidavit filed by advocate Utsav Bains, a bench last week appointed retired Justice A K Patnaik to go into the conspiracy, assisted by the CBI Director, Director of Intelligence Bureau and Commissioner of Police (Delhi).
Justice Patnaik had told The Indian Express that his inquiry would commence only after the in-house committee on the sexual harassment allegations concluded its finding.
The Final Verdict has yet to come from the Court

This Article Written on 5th May 2019 at 09.29 hrs
Jyotish Acharaya anil aggarwala
BSc.Production Engg. PEC Ch.

My youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9C4AIEjsr_d4W2UjB-s1Qw?view_as=subscriber
My Predictions on the Pulwama attack and IAF pouncing on Terror Camps of Jaish Prove on Dot for even the dat and time
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8MMibxweZg

Award Winner in Research in Astrology in Bhartiya Vidhya Bhawan New Delhi
Email: astrodoc.vedicastrology@gmail.com
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/astrodocanil/
Writer of Articles on Star Teller, Modern Astrology, The Planets & Forecast, Times of Astrology, Research Magzine of
All India Association of Astrologers, Journal of Astrology, Saptrishi Astrology, The Astrologic Magzine of Joni Patry of US
For My True Predictions, Expert Advice, Viewer Comments, Teaching and Consultation go on the Home Page and Click the Relevant Option
Financial Astrology Specialised Teaching Please contact me on +918527884764
What App Number +918527884764 Skypee ID aggarwalaanil
My Interview On the YouTube https://youtu.be/T5p-GkWZLjw
My Interview in Singapore On YouTube https://youtu.be/xrnXlAbx08k
My Interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrnXlAbx08k&t=1439s

My Interview by a University of Repute from US https://youtu.be/l6GdrMx4uSo in Nov. 2018
My Interview by the Express Star Teller Magzine published in Sept. 2017 edition on the page 34 link on my webpage

“Natal Chart Reflects Past Karmas,Deeds Of The Present Life Can Be Effectively Depicted,Only Through Prashna” My Interview With’EXPRESS STAR TELLER’

Link EXPRESS STAR TELLER https://www.starteller.com/article7.html
My Article In THE EXPRESS STAR TELLER Garbshishta Planets Play Prominent Role in Life Page 32 March 2018 edition
My Articles In the Astrology Magzine ASTROLOGIC MAGZINE of US My Article “Ammunition Dump Mars, Roman God Saturn and Nodes What They Have Up Their Sleeves in 2018-2019 ?” in the Leading Astrology Magzine of US Astrologicmagzine link http://www.astrologicmagazine.com/ammunition-dump-mars-rom…/
Disclaimer Clause applicable as mentioned in the Home Page and the Writter does not take the responsibility if any one investa according to the Above Predictions , in that case he would be doing it at his own risk and fancies

You may also like

error: Alert: Content selection is disabled!!